Negotiations with health plans can be challenging under the best of circumstances.
Existing contract assessment, reimbursement analysis, and facilitation of the negotiation all take time and an ability to analyze information and model scenarios on a real-time basis. Plus, new value-based payment methodologies present very different scenarios for providers to consider.
In addition to the time it takes to embark on such an endeavor, it can become overwhelming to identify and organize the information necessary for negotiations and to deploy consistently a contracting strategy.
We can help you identify where you want to be on the managed care contracting continuum and provide the necessary support to get you where you’re going.
Payer | Payer 1 | Payer 2 | Payer 3 | Transparency Site A | Transparency Site B |
Provider A | Tier 1 | Meets Quality, Not Cost | Not Listed | Cost > Peers | Not Listed |
Provider B | Tier 2 | Premium Designated | CIGNA Care Designated | Not Listed | ** Stars |
Provider C | Not Listed | Not Listed | CIGNA Care Designated | Cost < Peers | * Star |
Provider D | Tier 2 | Not Enough Data – Cost | Not Listed | Cost > Peers | Not Listed |
Provider E | Tier 2 | Meest Quality, Not Cost | CIGNA Care Designated | Not Enough Data | **** Stars |
Payer | Payer 1 | Payer 2 | Payer 3 | Transparency Site A | Transparency Site B |
Provider A | Tier 1 | Meets Quality, Not Cost | Not Listed | Cost > Peers | Not Listed |
Provider B | Tier 2 | Premium Designated | CIGNA Care Designated | Not Listed | ** Stars |
Provider C | Not Listed | Not Listed | CIGNA Care Designated | Cost < Peers | * Star |
Provider D | Tier 2 | Not Enough Data – Cost | Not Listed | Cost > Peers | Not Listed |
Provider E | Tier 2 | Meest Quality, Not Cost | CIGNA Care Designated | Not Enough Data | **** Stars |